The Oracle Institute
PDF version

In 306 CE, a group of western Catholic bishops met at the Council of Elvira and adopted the first anti-sex canon, although they stopped short of banning marriage (i.e., priests could remain married but had to practice celibacy). Then in 1039, Pope Leo IX imposed celibacy on all clergy, a decision that contributed to the Great Schism of 1054, when the Catholic Church split. The priests who formed the Eastern Orthodox Church have always maintained that the Catholic celibacy rule is man-made, as opposed to Divine law.

On October 20, 2009, the Catholic Church reversed nearly two thousand years of doctrinal (although not actual) celibacy. Can you guess why?

Is the Vatican ready to admit that the early Christian bishops were allowed to marry and have children? “Therefore, a bishop must be irreproachable, married only once …. He must manage his household well, keeping his children under control with perfect dignity; for if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how can he take care of the church of God?” (First Letter to Timothy 3:2).

Perhaps the Pope no longer can justify the ban, particularly since Saint Peter – one of Jesus’ primary apostles and the first Pope of Rome according to Catholic history – was married. (See Gospel of Mark 1:30).

Or maybe after paying two billion dollars to victims of priest-perpetrated sexual abuse, the Vatican has learned that forced celibacy often leads to closet homosexuality and pedophilia.

Or perhaps the Pope – former head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (a/k/a the Office of the Inquisition) – now feels empowered to institute needed change. After all, in the minds of compassionate and educated people, the Church’s antiquated dogma on celibacy, birth control, divorce, and female and gay priests, is offensive and contrary to the teachings of Jesus.

Unfortunately, though, none of the above reasons explain why the Catholic Church has reversed two thousand years of self-imposed celibacy. The truth is that the Vatican is relaxing the rule in order to poach priests from the Anglican Church, which permits its priests to marry. The Vatican is hoping to capture some of the 80 million Anglicans worldwide, including 3.2 million members of the U.S. Episcopal Church.

But why would an Anglican want to return to the mother church? Apparently, there are Anglican and Episcopalian parishes that would rather submit to the Pope than be subjected to priests who are female or gay. Thus, the Vatican is trying to lure away priests and laity who – like the all-boys club in Rome – suffer from misogyny and homophobia. Of course, the new guidelines from Rome do not apply to Catholic priests, who are expected to remain celibate.

Oh Lord, when will the Catholics learn what master Jesus came here to teach?

Comments

>>final motivator to actually

-

>>final motivator to actually change ...  will be a pragmatic one

 Isnt that something?  what motivates the pope, the church is pragmatic, not divine?

 >>you know that the best

-

 >>you know that the best record we have of what Jesus said is contained in the gnostic Gospel of Thomas
 
I know that book is 'another' record, I can't yield that is the 'best' record.  Just because Thomas supports, in places, more of my personal view, and it certainly plays into the anti-catholic leanings I have - it would be a mistake to say its best record of Jesus.  I don't want to make the mistake of saying Its best just because I like it and it is an enemy of my enemy kind of thing
 
As example, If great amounts of the Jesus story are from earlier myths, like Horis, if Jesus is a composite of person and myth, if any of those views have validity, then Thomas is as much in question as the rest of the gospels.
 
So, all this is to say is that in my view I don't 'know' what Jesus taught.  Ic an guess, I can filter and cherry pick, I can harmonize with love, agape and all that Christ energy stuff, I can read between the lines, I can adapt what I think is Jesus to more modern frameworks, perspectives,  but I don't know
 
Which completely takes away from your point that the catholic church needs to learn,  and change.  My issue with them is that they need to learn meaning they need to get modern, they need to bring their archaic believes forward a thousand years or so.  And they cant do that of course, but that more important to learn what we all think Jesus taught, at least to me.

Change in Priest Celibacy

-

Having been a close student of theology and Christian churches for several decades, my guess is that the final motivator to actually change the celibacy requirement will be a pragmatic one... as you imply, to recruit enough priests perhaps, or because the forces of change among the laity grow too strong to hold back. 

Jesus Taught Enlightenment

-

As the Pope, surely you know that the best record we have of what Jesus said is contained in the gnostic Gospel of Thomas. It was written around 45 C.E., which means it predates all four of the canonical gospels – the earliest of which was written forty years after the crucifixion. 

The reason most people don’t know about the Gospel of Thomas is that it was declared “heretical” by one of your predecessors and then ordered destroyed. Luckily, however, Egyptian monks defied the order and buried a cache of the gospels at Nag Hammadi. More than 50 texts were discovered there in 1945 and are now available to everyone. These gospels give a much fuller account of what Jesus taught, which I will happily and humbly summarize for you, my dear Pope: 

Jesus came to Earth to teach his followers a path to enlightenment (a/k/a heaven), just as the Buddha did 500 years earlier for his followers. 

PS:  You may find the gnostic Gospel of Philip and the Gospel of Mary quite edifying. Both gosples strongly suggest that Mary Magdalene was Jesus’ closest spiritual partner.

PPS:  Pope, why are you so frightened by feminine energy?

What Jesus Came To Teach

-

Dear Laura and fellow seekers,

If one only uses Jesus's words instead of the words of those who wrote about him, and if one looks for common denominators in what He said, and puts into a separate category things He said that do not seem to fit, Something very inner eye-opening begins to emerge that is a revelation to some and silly to others. What emerges for me are several things, including that He uses the term "heaven" to mean "clarity of sight and thinking" -- unadulterated by the beliefs, assumptions and conclusions we acquired as we became adults and are habitually inclined to use as adults. Thus, "being born again" or "reborn" to me means seeing once more with the clarity of an unaduterated child anything that will be obscured or distorted by what one "knows" to be true because she or he insists on it being true.

For examples, see Matthew 19 and 20. for more.

By the way, speaking of Matthew 20, ask a 100 priests of any Christian denomination -- or most other students of Jesus' Teachings, how many groups went into the vineyard, and you are likely to get an answer of five. Yet He clearly says two, the first and the last. And for an obvious reason, as Jesus clearly but subtly said, the three other groups went their way instead of the owner's way. At least clear for readers of His parable who are clearly paying attention to not just what, but how Jesus is exquisitely conveying this Teaching.  Yet who among us prefers to see things wholly clearly, with a total lack of ego -- the way an innocent babe does rather than as an adult with all of the priviledges (and cognitive constraints and spiritual baggage) that come with being an adult? Of course, we find the same Teachings within Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism, Islam, Taoism, Wicca, and Paganism... And, of course, Heraclitus said the above as well. And got the same blank stares that Jesus did!

I occasionally give a brief course called Time and The Templix about all this and some other things which are of interest only to advanced fellow seekers, those of us who know that what much of what we know may be worth less. Perhaps, I could give it at your school same time?

Warmest regards, Yale 

What Jesus Taught?

-

Ah there's the rub - what did jesus teach? what book?

Lt6Si99x